Today, in my village four wayspots was delated. Two of theme was gyms.
And one in different place:
I nominated these places 3 years ago. These places exist in real life. Is not fake nominations. Somebody gonna tell me, why this spots are delated?
Adress of this spots:
Powstańców Wielkopolskich 19, 64-150 Wijewo
These Wayspots seem to be on the property of a school which makes them ineligible. The fourth one seems to be taken from a third party source.
This is not school in this place. School is 150 meters from this place:
If this spots will not bring back in game, I’m done with this game.
http://wijewo.przedszkolna.net/
This link suggests otherwise (unless I’m mistaken).
Yes you are wrong. This building is a Municipal cultural center. It’s pin on maps, translate this if you want.
Next thing Monument to the Victims of War is on different property.
Another thing - Playing fields are on property of local football team name “Brenewia Wijewo” it’s pin too on the map.
This is school in this village:
That’s funny because I trying to nominated this mural:
And this spot was not accepted because is a school. So then, you delated 3x spots because you think is another school in small village?
You have really weird political.
Well. The building with the brick tree on it is a school.
The other building next to the big soccer field is a pre-school/kindergarten. The website @NianticAaron linked clearly says it is a “przedszkole”, which means pre-school. On street view you can even see the paper flowers that kids have made, displayed in the windows of the building. And the same building is clearly depicted on the preschool’s website.
It is completely normal for schools and pre-schools to be separate from each other, even in small places.
I have reinstated the Wayspots “Orlik” and “Pomnik upamiętniający”.
There is a pre-school/kindergarten in the same building where “Poczta Polska” was located. So, we cannot reinstate that.
@NianticAaron Just for clarification, the crèche is not the wayspot, the post office is. This is a multi use building.
So if there are multiple wayspots in a commercial building and someone opens a crèche, pre-school in the same building, are we meant to request removal of all other legitimate wayspots?
For instance there is a shopping centre I know of that has approx 12 wayspots, all legit and eligible but I know a crèche chain has opened in that same building, am I meant to request removal of all the other legitimate wayspots because a crèche has moved in, even though said crèche is not a nomination?
100% true. I living 25 years in this village. In this building was a police office, municipal office, library, health center, pharmacy.
And right now is a Municipal Cultural Center.
I agree with you, when the building is 100% school, but this building is very big and has many doors to many institutions.
Yes, I was just about to post that, they even have separate entrances
This is the entrance to the pre-school. (Seperate entity)
@extaza161 if this isn’t overturned just put in the Basketball Court or the monument beside it and you should have a wayspot back in the same place.
It is ridiculous though, I know these types of buildings as I’ve been to Poland many, many times. They are basically community centres/hubs with multiple offices, businesses, services in the same building but all completely separate.
That’s my plan, I will nominate basketball court, but I need make photo
And next weird situation. Im a player of local football team. We playing on this big stadium “Brenewia Wijewo” close to this two little playing fields. 2 month ago I nominate this stadium, but is not accepted by duplicate 
Some edits might be in order for whichever label(s) is inaccurate (or can be improved) before having the larger field in voting. It may have been duplicated with “Orlik” at the time of review, the photo is of the small football field (you can check if the photo is added in the gallery for Orlik). The small football field seems to be labelled “Stadion Brenewia Wijewo” in Google Maps too, that might be a source of confusion. “Estadio Santago Bernabeu” is not showing in this map.
It may also work best to pin this following this clarification, the bleachers is probably the best place to pin the larger field in this case.:
Hey NianticAaron
About 4th delated wayspot. If I send you real photo from this place you bring back this wayspot?
Or if you bring back this wayspot I try edited photo in 48h.
I don’t think that’s very fair. The location of the reinstated Wayspot is well away from the Child Care Entrance and closer to the actual Post Office’s entrance, so it’s a more accurate location overall.
I think Orlik is the large field.
The pin is now in the middle
I believe you gave information for this correction, with your labeled photo showing the location of the school vs the post office.
Edit: I may have misunderstood which wayspot(s) were moved. If it is the Field then I’m not sure why that would have been adjusted based on the conversation in the thread. Seems like sideline was a better spot.
You may well be right! But With the three Wayspots showing on the map currently, I can’t see how any accurate placement would still allow the basketball court to show up in Pokemon Go. To manipulate the location of other Wayspots to allow more in-game objects seems to be by far the more deliberate action with malicious intent.
Yes, here are you perfectly right!
I’ve had understood frustration, if the post office doesn’t have been reinstated (I thought maybe not 20m for than the basketball court?).
But the change of Orlik, for me as a not effected, seems weird too
OK, looking back at the original IITC images, it looks like any moves during reinstatement were quite minimal. I still really think Niantic did the right thing here and I don’t understand why these actions could be considered at all malicious: one can still nominate the basketball court which was originally suggested as a replacement Wayspot only. It might not show up in certain games, of course.
