This is what I was able to find on the Internet, but I’m sure there’s way more of them around the world.
While all these paintings and murals are not 100% the same (some use 3D elements, some use different colors) and they all are hand-made, they are still mass-produced from one original design for Starbucks.
The removal reason is this is a mass-produced item that shouldn’t have been nominated, let alone approved. And no, I don’t need a lecture that removal criteria and eligibility/acceptance criteria are different.
Mass-production is not a removal reason. Removal criteria is more strict than approval criteria. I can easily see how someone thought this was an original art piece, not mass produced, and nominated it, and the community didn’t bother to check that it’s in a Starbucks.
There’s a lot of mass-produced things with Wayspots in the world that we would love to get rid of, but right now it can’t be done unless it meets one of the removal reasons on the removal request screen, and mass-produced is not a reason.
Thanks for the appeal, @Itsutsume. We took another look at the Wayspot in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.
Think of it this way: the Starbucks art you reported isn’t in every store, while the Blaze Pizza logo is and is an advertisement, not art. There’s a Blaze Pizza where I live, so I’ve seen the logo while driving by. I personally haven’t seen that specific artwork in any of my local Starbucks.
It may be mass-produced art, but it’s still art, not an ad, hence why it doesn’t meet removal criteria.
Do remember that each case is individually assessed about removal.
Each will be looked at holistically.
The result of one appeal does not set any precedence about another for removal and does not provide “case law” for accepting a nomination.
They are different things.