Just curious if these were worth submitting or not. Me personally id be 50/50 on them, but they were made by housing association to be green spaces, with one specifically.made for people to have a quiet area (which, now im typing them, might go against them as poke.on go players trudging by might not go down well lol)
The second photo is something I would accept (assuming everything checks out OK). It’s clearly a water retention space, which is not eligible in itself, but it has an interesting design feature running through it to make it more than that, plus it’s clearly intended to be interacted with.
The first photo is much less interesting for a wayspot.
1 Like
Interesting.
It does come across as a clear landscaped space with a purpose to visit it and spend time there.
I guess in summer it would be nice to have a picnic there or in winter a fun place to play in the snow.
I’m not a fan of signfarer 
but I can’t help think that a sign at the top of the steps outlining the info from the website would be best.,
I would apply the same logic to any of the SuDS which more typically are landscaped ponds.
We do need these green spaces in our urban developments.
Annoyingly there isnt any signs (at least that i could see, it was dark when I went thus morning). I may give it a tru and put the website in as supporting info but I suspect info
On the 2nd photo i see a typical certain type of uk park intended for activity and gathering. This should not need a sign. It is clearly public space to any reasonable reviewer.