Looking for clarity on "locally longstanding/cultural hotspot"

Hospitals aren’t eligible because they don’t meet any of the eligibility criteria (great place to socialize/explore/exercise). But places in or around a hospital could meet criteria (cafe, art, plaque, etc). The only exception would be if the potential wayspot is close to or in the emergency ward.

I think apartment building and condominium complexes are a good example of a place that is not itself eligible but may have many eligible wayspots on or in the property. Playgrounds, gyms, pools, and other communal amenities could be eligible.

1 Like

Hospitals are not ineligible because they don’t meet criteria, they are ineligible because Niantic has explicitly said they fit the emergency services category.

Apartment buildings and Condominium Complexes ARE eligible, if you can convince reviewers how they meet criteria.

How’d you get that Ambassador tag?

I am a Wayfarer Ambassador that was selected last year. I am here because I like helping folks understand the ins and outs of finding, nominating, and reviewing wayspots.

I can understand hesitancy about nominating things in hospitals because of the potential for obstruction of emergency services. But even with that as a Rejection reason Hospitals themselves are not a great place to be social, are not a great place to exercise, and are not a great place to explore. So the hospital itself is not eligible.

I’m very curious why you think apartment buildings and Condominiums are inherently eligible? What aspect(s) do they meet?

3 Likes

I try and focus on intent of what a thing is or represents. For example a Park is put in by a community for people to go there to socialize and exercise and generally just have fun. It’s a destination for recreation. So the Park is inherently eligible. Then we can also highlight the playground, sports fields, pool, etc. in addition to

A Plaza tends to lend itself to encouraging people to come out to restaurants, shops, and gyms. So while not every business front may be eligible, as a whole it tends towards eligibility.

Apartments/condos are primarily for people to live. It is not a destination that others get excited about going to. But as mentioned above communal amenities can meet eligibility.

So the TLDR is that I look at both the whole thing and the pieces separately when I am trying to determine what is eligible.

2 Likes

Where?

Our local Hospital has…

  • Memorial x 2.
  • Fountain.
  • Time Capsule.
  • Sculpture x 2.
  • Listed building (now used for training).
  • Outdoor Gym.
  • Sensory Garden.
  • Sun Dial.
  • Plaque.

None of them obstruct the Emergency entrance or any of the emergency areas so all eligible.

2 Likes

I already shared the link that said no hospitals.

Now your turn to answer where - where did I say you couldn’t nominate any of those things?

but it doesn’t say that. do you mean this?

  • Location obstructs the driveways of emergency services or may interfere with the operations of fire stations, police stations, hospitals, military bases, industrial sites, power plants, or air traffic control towers
1 Like

If I find an apartment on the national register of historic places, take a picture of the building itself (not a plaque or anything else) and nominate it, it is eligible.

If I do the same for a hospital on the NRHP, it is not eligible.

Because Niantic has stated hospitals are ineligible, and they’ve never stated apartment buildings are ineligible.

In your example of unique architecture for the hospital I could see nominating it. I would make sure to pick a spot that is nowhere near the Emergency ward but still shows the distinct architecture. This could meet eligibility and not trigger the rejection.

1 Like

A hospital could be eligible for the same reasons you give for apartments being eligible. They are never explicitly ineligible.

No, they haven’t.

Someone may Google search and come upon this wrong statement and be misled. That is why I am adamant about this point.

2 Likes

“I think apartment building and condominium complexes are a good example of a place that is not itself eligible but may have many eligible wayspots on or in the property. Playgrounds, gyms, pools, and other communal amenities could be eligible”

Go talk to this ambassador who said otherwise.

@cyndiepooh and I are in agreement on these topics. You may have misunderstood one of us if you think otherwise.

2 Likes

““I think apartment building and condominium complexes are a good example of a place that is not itself eligible”

Someone may Google search and come upon this wrong statement BY AN AMBASSADOR and be misled. That is why I am adamant about this point.

But that statement is correct.

An apartment/condominium complex does not meet criteria in itself. It would have to have something else besides just existing to meet criteria.

4 Likes

This is not a wrong statement.

An Apartment/Condo complex does not meet eligibility.

Communal resources at these locations could be eligible.

1 Like

The top google search is from the subreddit - go correct them:

image

Go yell at them if you’re so worried about accuracy.

wrong, a complex is eligible itself if it meets criteria.

I don’t worry about what is posted on Reddit. I am concerned about what is posted on the official forum.

1 Like

I’m not an official.

But an official ambassador (and you) made a false statement.

Don’t worry about me, worry about yourself and them.