It attracts tourists are well as agents, and large groups of agents have gathered here safely to fight their battles. It is not located in one-family residence, neither is it obstructing any emergency services. It is very distinct (the only two cows on a roof!), not general, and the cows are not alive. I don’t understand why this Wayspot was removed, and allege that this is an abuse from the reporting side.
These are amazing! I just had to look this up to see cows on a roof. But I would suggest adding any proof you have that this is not SFPRP (single family private residential property) to your appeal statement here, because it does look like that to someone not familiar with the area.
The bull is gone :D, hence the name - Cows without a bull.
How do I prove that that property is not SFPRP? I mean, I know it because I know that area, but I don’t live in that house… So what proof can there be?
If it is not a single family home, you should be able to find some record of what it is. Is it apartments? Is it a business? Is there a property map listing?
It is apartments, but I do not know how many. Not sure about business.
However, the portal was in range from the street, as I am sure is visible from historic data somewhere in the logs :D, there is no obstruction to access it.
range does not matter, the exact location of the point of interest featured as a wayspot matters. (some games require you to be right on top of the wayspot.) if you have any evidence that this address is apartments, that will help your appeal. it does not matter how many apartments.
Thank you for your help and explanation! I searched the address database and it does seem that there are two apartments there: (Dzīvoklis is an apartment in English)
I still don’t know how they will decide because they usually emphasize that “common areas” of apartment communities are eligible, but that document should help prove what the property is.
