When reviewing (at least on mobile), entering that a nomination is inaccurate, inappropriate, unsafe, etc. automatically brings the reviewer to the next one. If a nomination fails to meet more than one of the basic qualifications, then which one gets priority for me to answer no to, if I can only answer one?
I’ve dealt with this once during my short time here. It was abuse (just begging for stops) a bad description (mentioning a niantic game in the description) and was a duplicate. I reported it as a duplicate and moved on. Was this the right call?
Yes, right, do not overthink.
I generally choose the most egregious or the most constructive. So abuse first. Otherwise if it is fixable then I choose the one that will give the best feedback like 3rd party photo/ watermark.