Third party photo report rejected (Met 1 Basketball Court)

I think we have a fundamentally different understanding of community review. I thought that the purpose was to put good Wayspots on the map, and to prevent ones from going live that shouldn’t. I thought the community agreement aspect was to keep a check on people going away from criteria in their decisions. I do not see how staff handling a flag for a third party/ai photo internally interferes with that purpose.

What is your understanding of the purpose of community review?


I just happened to notice that this Wayspot that had been submitted with a third party photo has been removed.