Would changes to criteria be useful

General Discussion
34

Here is an example I have of a sizeable recreation area with no signs or entrance points. Rejected by ML and then appeal not accepted. Although the guidance encourages the wayspot to be placed at an entrance point or placemarker sign, none of these exist at that location and the criteria clarification acknowledges how this situation should be dealt with by clearly stating that “If there is an obvious entrance or focal point, that would be a good location to place the pin, but equally the middle of the park may be suitable.”