So a stop sign, large rock and ugly bush all meet your requirements and you would approve?
There have been made clarification on survey markers:
Please explain what doesnāt make sense.
You are stating because people would meet at a definable location place or thing itās a landmark or is worth of being a stop. Guidelines state that is not justification for being a stop from my understanding.
There are famous rocks and rock formations in parks that people pay to see and I would imagine are stops. So the community disagrees that large rocks arenāt landmarks.
You can use anything to meetup before doing anything in the game. As said a rock can also qualify as a meeting spot, but that doesnāt mean it should get accepted. Provide clear evidence with links or articles why you think this is better and eligible otherwise people will question you for a while.
Thanks. That would have been an obvious place for me to check my memory. That clarification definitely arrived a long time after the threads about the state survey markers in NSW were active.
This is totally true. The person is not providing clear evidence and tries to promote it as a spot, which anything can do. Letās rest if for now until they provide clear evidence. Otherwise you can keep going for hours.
Honestly I donāt care which way this issue goes I just want to know the guidelines and clarification. The issue is people defend these most likely for their own connivence, the live within spin distance or required to leave neighborhood.
Like I said I donāt agree with everything that has been determined to be appropriate but how I feel doesnāt matter once a decision is made known.
How you use the signs does not make them meet criteria. They were not created as a place to assemble to do raids in Pokemon Go.
Thank you for perfectly illustrating the point that we need a clarification on these.
is this going to be on the next podcast
@mikie Yeah weāre gonna talk about this on the next show
Is there really a podcast?
You realize your defintion of landmark isnāt the layed out by Niantic correct?
That by proceeding this way you are going against the spirit of the process, right?
Because people choose to look at it this way is why there need to be clarification to prevent this from continuing.
Iām not offering to teach you as you donāt listen, ignore questions, and canāt explain why you do things.
Also wayfarer does remove poke spots, itās niantic employees that deal with appeals.
I just want the game to work as intended and Iām glad that if conversations like this are reviewed both points will be considered.
Yes there is, we drop episodes every Sunday.
Is it an official one of fan made community one?
Weāre not affiliated with Niantic, Scopely, or Wayfarer officially if thatās what youāre asking
Dang it but awesome .i hope you guys have lists of success. Iām just looking for insight and ways to communicate with the company.
If you can link me to you conversation of episode where this is discussed I would be happy to listen as I want varying view points.
Thank you everyone for sharing your views and a lively discussion. Based on the contents of this discussion, Iāll be closing it from further engagement.
