I agree
So many NSW Survey Marks coming back in. And we put things in the Featured showcase section that clearly fail criteria. People see them and go OK. ME I would moderate the featured section . Monthly with real good examples so we help people on their first visit to see what quality looks like.
Showcase rubbish equals rubbish in
But a question. And I have raised it before. When a place becomes full of everything or a place has little - will peope just nominate anything?
We all know the system is poor at onboarding people. We still give medals for chugging through reviewing. I spoke with someone the other day who said they just click through not looking. More rubbish
And Emily may have been so good at accepting the quality stuff all we had for a time was dross dross and dross to review. Real pap coming in. It showed just quite the quality of junk the system has to deal with.
I wish Emily could be partially let loose on somethings we just know fail. Simplify the behaviour. And would love Emily pull similar things already accepted in system for a secondary review. Such as Survey Marks. Not that you can tell I have anything against them. Just using it as an example. 
Of like this fake I posted Going mad or is this another fake could Emily be set loose on finding these… Because potentially a time will come when AI nominations will fly through the system.
I like Emily. I think @Glawhantojar we have no idea quite how much the old ML did.
@DTrain2002 I also think ML can take the fun out of it if it removes the challenges. Same same same everyday can colour the thinking. And a good challege is also a learning experience of other countries.
Balance hey.
Back to the orginal sentiment. Cookies all round for everyone. Double cookies for cleaning up the showcase 
Treble cookies çause it is Saturday where I am