When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:
Wayspot Title: Herstel Omgeving Deelense Was
Location (lat/lon): Ingress
City: Hoenderloo
Country: Netherlands
Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
Additional Information (if any):
I see a big discrepancy in the wayspot photo’s angle and the angle of your “evidence”. It’s almost as if the sign could be located just off-screen in your photo.
Good eye with the Ingress faction wars tag edit, @iFrankmans
There’s several photospheres in this location. Going by what I can see in those photospheres, the object would be visible in @justmeister 's photo around where the bike on the right is located if it was still in its original location.
For everyone who is trying to appeal any POIs (regardless of games or factions) if you can add a scaniverse scan to the appeal it would make things a lot easier as it would put a stop to the endless debates about whether something is gone or is hiding in a corner just outside of the picture.
I was there a few months ago, he took the photo exactly of the spot where the sign was. And You know that.
So why being so childish?
Take a picture with the newspaper of today with the sign to prove that the sign is back/still there.
For now it was the Deelense waS, and it is not the Deelense Was
Sure, but then the wood of the fences in his evidence looks completely different from the wood in the photosphere. And the fences have a different layout too. So it could still be taken in a different but similar-looking bike stop. It’s hardly conclusive evidence until it’s a photo taken in the same angle as the wayspot photo and with a geotag to verify the location.
For those who are thinking about the proof you are asking for… https://youtu.be/vq85TlMBmIY?feature=shared
They are renovating the area, as you can see by the new wooden fence they placed. For these renovations the sign has temporarily been removed but it will be back
Okey but the poi is now not there any more. So the poi needs to be away now.
And if the the poi is there ones again. You can re-submid the poi.
No, the poi needs to go away because it’s an ENL anchor portal for an ~2 M mu perma field.
How many times have you done this now? Still don’t realize the fields will only grow bigger with more layers and more mu?
Screenshot of part of the layers, full setup has 20 more
Based on the direction this discussion is headed, we’ll be closing it for further comments. We’ll provide an update on the appeal as soon as it’s available. Thank you.
Thanks for the appeal, @justmeister. After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve decided to retire the Wayspot in question.
