Global Reviewer Challenge - Race Around the World! - Discussion

The highest is set high. If we keep up the pace, I don’t think 90k is going to be even hard.

It’s fine for you to have this obligation, sir, but it isn’t an obligation of mine! If, for instance, a church says what it is, it’s fine as far as I’m concerned for a nominator to tell reviewers what that church says it is. In fact, I’d say it would not only be accurate but polite. Disclaimer: I am 100% against the any and all churches and religions that are anti-LGBTQ, cover up abuse, etc.

When reviewing some wayspots for Japan, I got several times the same spot as a duplicate with the exact same photo.
At first I thought it was only an usual duplicate, but not the second/third time…

It’s clear that some of the portal candidates have been the exact same than the existing portal. As in same photo, same submitted text oftentimes. I’m not sure why. I’ve seen like two dozen of these.

Ahhh… now I get it. But I’m from an area of England that gets some of it’s identity from a history of being at war with Scotland, and I’m here to say that the Scots are jealous of nothing, apart from that just sometimes they wish it were a bit warmer and would stop raining.

1 Like

It doesn’t matter which picture is original. You’re just asked which don’t meet criteria. Are any blurry, show the car dash, have a stuffed animal or something in it to flag the submitter?

Beyond that, we have to trust the local community to thumbs up the best one.

1 Like

this doesnt make sense i guess it means that you are suggesting to put photos of different location portal or a pokestop. The photo should be matching to the origanl pokestop or portal in that location.

Where does it say that an object or stuffed animal cannot be in it? I mean I know my youngest enjoys having his in mine. So I snap an extra for him or occasionally have it in the supporting photo. But I have seen some community playgrounds etc with maybe a toy or animal left there.
I know many older photos have a skateboard in it or another object. I understand that before ingress players did this to verify it was a real live location not third party etc.

Extraneous objects can be seen as submitter identifiable especially if it appears to be deliberate or staged. A cap with a PoGO team insignia, a posed dog, and a circle of rocks on top of a table are a few cases back in the old forum.

Granted, some objects are just there at the location so it comes with using your best judgement.

4 Likes

Ummmm… I know there was another thread that got a bit heated on the topic of banks… I always enjoy support comments like this :joy:
image

I also had some interesting photo reviews for natural areas. Latest one was for water :thinking: Interesting wayspots in the USA.

Wonder if they are originally from Vietnam…

But seriously, K-12 schools are in the category list, but they’re still not allowed. Then there are places that aren’t in the category list, like pickleball courts, but as long as the courts meet criteria, such as those at public parks, they’re allowed.

Some people, I tell ya…

2 Likes

is it me… or are there way to many of these churches in america:
image

Checked the interwebs… 32000 Congregations. oh my

still most banks are not portal worthy. and can be shot of as Apropriate, generic business

It’s in the Challenges category, and not with the best title, I may add:

2 Likes

image

1 Like

image
I totally agree. this forum and their way of contacting them truely is poorly

2 Likes

This challenge apart from the hiccups has been one of the easiest so far in terms of review speed and simplicity of reviews.

I think a little communication across all the different game fronts could have seen it at double the amount of the current community total.

2 Likes

Can you even get to wayfarer as a player of pikmin bloom or Peridot?

I don’t think so but don’t most Pikmin and Dot players usually come from Go or Ingress?

1 Like

Longest description Ive ever seen

Luckily this was just a picture edit, not a game of spot the typo

1 Like