Hello,
I need some opinions about these nominations that have been rejected. I will appeal them later when I have appeals avaible, but until then I would like thoughts on these.
2 cases of being rejected
Very similiar case of one of these signs being accepted by the inhouse review
Proof that it was a inhouse review:
if I came across these to review, my thoughts would be:
is there any evidence showing it exists there, at that location? Does the museum/building have a website which includes this as one of its exhibitions? Balance of probabilities works in your favour, but evidence is helpful because of the following.
are there several of these information boards already in the game (because with too many close together they start to become indistinct) ?
I believe those are eligible but maybe try getting one thats have different theme from whats ald approved. I believe there is a bunch of it inside.
Unfortunately they are all in the same style.
I have submitted 10 of them. 4 approved, 2 rejected so far
Well i see private property rejection which should be incorrect if i believe this is kinda like museum
But why do you called it expo? Is it opened permanently or is it seasonal?
The Museum calls itself “Space Expo”. As far as I know they are opened 6 days a week.
Do the exhibits themselves have Wayspots? If so, I would most likely mark the signs as duplicates of the exhibit, as the sign is a part of the exhibit, not separate from them.
Think of it this way: you may find a statue in a public area, like a plaza, with a plaque that has the title of the work and the artist’s name on it, as well as some additional info. I’d submit the statue as a whole, not both the statue and the plaque are separate POIs.
The exhibit only has a imported powerspot.
As for other wayspots, not much, just 2 things that are outside the exhibit and are not part of it. That’s why I thought that maybe these information signs could bring more attention to the actual exhibit.
Hi @AMG7070
If I’d have that in review I’d probably have doubts of it’s permanence. I think you should adress that in your nomination and that Expo is part of the name.
My first impression would be something like “New exhibition in town. Join from Oct 25 to Jan 26”.
Thx for the advice and your view. I can see where the people and reviewers might be coming from.
I will make sure to include these facts in the appeals I will do later.
Thx
