Lakeside Observation Deck

Nomination Support
1

Screenshot_20250418-002236_Chrome
Screenshot_20250418-002236_Chrome1080×2280 181 KB

Screenshot_20250418-002209_Chrome
Screenshot_20250418-002209_Chrome1080×2280 124 KB

Screenshot_20250418-002135_Chrome
Screenshot_20250418-002135_Chrome1080×2280 127 KB

-6.123481, 106.692873
Appreciate suggestion to improve. I am guessing people pick not distinct. But how can people not find it in satelite view ah?

1 Like
2

I shared some of my personal examples in this thread:

I poked around on the map but couldn’t find your nomination - probably just me being unfamiliar with the area.

The advice “know your audience” comes up. I don’t know what to expect from Indonesia reviewers so I don’t think I cat offer much suggestion besides what’s in my other post.

Good luck - I love areas like this!

3

Its ok. I am looking into other people perspective to improve my nomination.

If i use this for supporting photo, is it better? Now that u said it, the object is not exactly close to road so nd to zoom a bit. But i mean it when i said its visible from both satelite and streetview

20250418_101033
20250418_1010331920×1920 215 KB

4

Hi @TjoeMi
First of all: beautiful photos :clap::heart_eyes:
I want to add something to the rejection reason ‘mismatched location’.
In your main photo the deck seems to be not that wide and the surrounding photo shows nearly a platform. On the first sight it doesn’t look like the same place.
Maybe reviewers saw it similar :woman_shrugging:t2:

1 Like
5

Hm. Noted. i will mention because most of the platform is covered by tree as per surrounding photo. The “wide” platform visible is only the tip. The body is stretch deep under the tree. Maybe i nd better surrounding photo. I will resubmit this with more detail later. Thanks for the advice

1 Like
6

Screenshot_20250501-152513_Gmail
Screenshot_20250501-152513_Gmail1080×2280 245 KB

It finally got approved on appeal. I need to work on number 1 and 2 but still cant get good photo

4 Likes