Before I go for an appeal or re-submission, I was wondering if anyone could help me tidy up this nomination that’s just been rejected. I’m leaning gently towards resubmission as I think I can do a better job with the primary photo.
But first - here’s the nomination for reference:
Title: Boxhill Wood Nature Walk Sign
Rejection Criteria: Temporary/Seasonal or Not Distinct
Description:
A sign marking the Nature Walk running through Boxhill Wood, an area that has stood largely unchanged for over a century as the town of Abingdon expanded around it. The primary paved route of the trail connects The Motte to Boxhill Road, with several natural paths forking off to enable quiet exploration of the secluded woods.
Supplemental information:
This sign provides the most obvious way to discover a local hidden gem - a trail in a quiet area of riverside woodland tucked away inside the town of Abingdon. The primary routes around it are well maintained and fully paved, with additional tracks offering options to explore the secluded natural woodland. This woodland was originally part of the FitzHarris estate, purchased by the UK government in 1946 as a suitable site to build houses for the then-new Atomic Energy Establishment at Harwell. The oldest maps detailed enough to show the region prove that it existed at least a 150 years ago - you can see established woodland in the same plot in this 1875 survey as an overlay on aerial imagery with this link: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/print/#zoom=17.3&lat=51.67550&lon=-1.28314&layers=117746211&b=1&o=78 I appreciate the sign itself is relatively generic. Unfortunately, although it’s an ancient site (the FitzHarris estate was originally a 12th century property belonging to the abbey: https://www.abingdon.gov.uk/abingdon_streets/fitzharris-estate ), the woods themselves are not very well advertised despite being maintained as natural woodland for residents to enjoy.
Though inconspicuous, this sign is therefore an important one for highlighting opportunities for exploration in the area just beyond the primary paved route through running through the wood. The main natural paths inside the woods can be seen on this map: https://mapcarta.com/W55567882
This link should take you to a Google Street View in a position on The Motte east of the sign that allows you to see it from a distance looking down a paved footpath and over a wooden fence: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.674061,-1.2811894,3a,41.6y,297.79h,81.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1se9_hvSkAjIEI6MoqFBh3Kg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
So! As you can see, it’s a remarkably old woodland area with some history that now finds itself surrounded by houses. There’s a set of maintained paths constituting a “Nature Walk” according to the town council. It feels like there’s a reasonable POI in here somewhere, but maybe this sign isn’t it?
I’m assuming the temporary part of the rejection isn’t the reason here, as the sign is visible on 2015 Google Maps Street View. Not Distinct feels like a stretch though - I’ve never seen a sign like this one anywhere else! This sign fails to mention the name of the walk or woods, though, and I suspect that makes it an “easy” rejection.
I figure my options are:
- Roll the dice and resubmit/appeal as it
- Try again but with the name “Boxhill Wood Nature Walk” and note that the sign is being used to anchor it. Take out the explanation of the routes inside the wood and highlight more of it’s specific history.
- Accept that this isn’t a valid POI for the database.
Am I on the right track, or getting something obvious wrong?