Looking for Feedback: Making Long Supporting Info More Reader-Friendly

I understand, but the problem is, appeals are quite rare to get, and I’d need a lot to get this trail through… But yes, I fear, this is the way.

I still think a better formatting options (Like Hyperlinks, pragraphs…) in Supporting Informations would be really helpful to make more detailled descriptions more viable.

Edit: I changed my Supporting info to:

Wanderwege sind sehr gute POI, da sie zum gemeinsamen wandern und erkunden einladen. Karte de Wegs: → Waymarked Trails - Hiking ← Diese Art von Markierungen ist Permanent. Hier ein Video wo gezeigt wird, wie Wanderwege in Deutschland markiert sind: → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84EryF7hwo4 ← ab Minute 1:00. Diskussion dazu im Wayfarer Forum: → I don't agree with this Appeal decision, please have a second look. (Hike trail) ← Deutschlands besondere Wanderkultur ist ein besonderes kulturelles Merkmal unseres Landes und verdient daher besondere beachtung.

Translation:

Hike Trails are excellent POI, as they encourage hiking in groups and exploration. Map of the Trail: → Waymarked Trails - Hiking ← This kind of marker is permanent. Here is a video, wich shows how trails in germany are marked: → https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84EryF7hwo4 ← from minute 1:00. Linked discussion in the wayfarer Forums: → I don't agree with this Appeal decision, please have a second look. (Hike trail) ← germanys special hiking culture is an exceptionally valuable cultural feature of our country and therefore deserves special recognition.

Its way shorter, but not as short @cyndiepooh suggested. What do you guys think?

Also what do you think about seperating Links in supporting info with arrows? I think it makes it easier to spot them in the Textwalls that supporting info texts are…

1 Like