What about me? Has anyone asked me, hey, do low quality nominations make you sad to the point where you don’t want to nominate anything? Or do I not matter? 
And I mentioned this above - a good wayspot is not just a good POI. A wayspot with spelling errors might not be good.
Choosing a photo for your nomination is important.
This sign that shows park hours, rules and other info –
– which can be seen on submitted surroundings photo would be better than submitted wayspot photo.
I like the sign they picked better.
Correct! You, as an nominator can do that.
In my attached screenshot is described that you, as an reviewer can’t and how niantic wanted you to act, if you have to review a nomination with spelling failures.
Not my rules 
I don’t think the process caters for your feelings, since you’re acting outside of the guidelines for reviewing. We aren’t supposed to reject for minor spelling mistakes, so if they make you sad, unfortunately that’s something you need to work on and stick to the Niantic guidelines regardless of your feelings on the matter
Being overly pedantic will just upset you as well as the submitter
If a single letter typo upsets a reviewer to the point of wanting to quit then yeah maybe it’s not the hobby for them.
We have had this discussion before.
@Itsutsume it would be helpful if you didn’t keep reiterating your wrong interpretation of the use of I don’t know.
If something does not fit perfectly with the guidelines for 
it does not mean that you give it 
.
There are guidelines for the situations that mean you are rejected are different. Wayfarers have a grey area in between where things that don’t fit either can go and it is “ I don’t know if this is either or . “
I personally would prefer other wording but this is what we have.
You have had this explained to you before.
Please do take time to reflect and absorb this. You need to take on board that what you say on this matter is highly misleading to someone who is new and may be reading this looking for good advice, and have you giving very poor advice.
Please stop this behaviour it is not helpful.
Thanks to the other contributors in this thread for helping to clarify.
My advice about editing nominations was not aimed at reviewers - it was aimed at submitters:
I never even said that ALL spelling errors should be rejected. But if you manage to butcher 1 of 3 words in the title AND in the description in TWO different ways, it’s not a minor mistake. I mean, come on! I am providing advice on how to make nominations and wayspots better, and instead of support I get “This is fine”. I was told that perfect is the enemy of good, but it seems that the most vocal here don’t want even good - they want just barely good enough. “Here’s how you can make it better” - “Oh, it was already good enough, it should be approved, then someone else should fix it”. Would be great to have less wayspots that don’t induce eye rolling and don’t need fixing. Would you buy a product that needs to be fixed right out of the box? I understand all the excuses, but this is why I said - please double-check what you type and also you have ability to make any corrections if needed after you submit.
And my content was aimed for you 
(as a reviewer):
You:
Me:
I just realized that you completely misunderstood my advice about Wayfarer website for corrections. It was aimed at submitters to tell them where they can go to correct their own errors. For some reason you thought it was aimed at reviewers to correct other submitters’ errors.
We already been thru this, yes. And what I got out of it is that the most vocal here rate accuracy as “mostly accurate/mostly inaccurate” (grade scale), while I usually rate accuracy as “accurate/not accurate” (true or false). There are exceptions, of course, but I try to stick with true or false. And to me “accuracy” part involves correct spelling and grammar, too, especially considering spelling and grammar were mentioned in Reviewing a Wayspot Nomination — Wayfarer Help Center. Again, doesn’t mean I will reject EVERY nomination with incorrect spelling.
“I don’t know” to me means I don’t know if:
I doesn’t mean “I don’t know what Niantic wants me to do here” as someone else suggested. It doesn’t mean that if you know the correct spelling, you should use IDK because submitted spelling is incorrect - because if you know, you know, and if you say you don’t know while you actually know, you would be lying.
scribing, scribing, scribing …
deleting, deleting, deleting …
Don’t feed the troll
Have a good and fullfilled life @Itsutsume
Have you considered to look at who is telling you differently here? Various ambos have weighed in to tell you tje intentions of IDK. I HATE to play the ambo card, but please consider who is offering you the advice.
Just to be clear, IDK is amd can be used neutrally for grey area, low severity cases. Niantic doesn’t demand perfection as you seem to do (based on your removal appeals).
Ambassadors can be wrong, too - Invalid Wayspot - Getty Museum Garden Labrynth and Invalid Wayspot - Acorn Carving.
Also, most of my appeals get accepted, so…
Great, so you link one where Niantic got it wrong, and another where the ambo stated a fact and nothing more than that.
Are you saying that Niantic got things wrong? Are you saying that even Niantic can get things wrong, let alone ambassadors and regular players?
If you want a but of fun see what the desperate players in Zimbabwe submit 
