Massive rejections

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

  • Wayspot Title:imagínate un goodjob

  • Location (lat/lon):-31.412786, -64.159796

  • City:cordoba

  • Country:argentina

  • Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):

  • Additional Information (if any): dice que hay un centro educativo, pero es un centro universitario para formar y no esta ni si quiera en el mismo edificio.

The google maps pin at that location is for “UP INNOVACION EDUCATIVA : Co-ed school”, but the website is clearly an educational establishment aimed at adults: https://upinnovacioneducativa.com.ar/

that´s an old thing and is not in the same building….

I can’t see what you submitted, just suggesting that the school maps pin may have misled the appeal reviewer, since the pin is misleading and it isn’t a school for children.

1 Like

It would be really helpful if you can share the whole nomination- then we’d have more information and be able to help better

2 Likes

Hi @ImAgInArIuS
Welcome to the forum :hugs:
I’ve moved your topic to Nomination Support because the category Wayspot Appeals is for appealing rejected removal requests or to ask for reinstating removed wayspots.
I see you’re already in good hands :hugs:

is just a plate where a building colapsed…

It doesnt seems great place to socialize/explore/exercise. Is it possible to share more detail on this nomination?

Is it some kind of memorial plaque for the people who were affected by the building collapse? Could we see pictures of it and the description and supoorting information?

you can see it on the map of google next to it there still the building colapsed…it´s been years since the building is in the same way.

Where is the plate where the buidling collapsed? Is it just this barrier where advertisements are plastered? Or did you mean to say “place”. At the moment, a collapsed/in-construction buidling does not seem like the best place for a wayspot to go. Maybe when it has been rebuilt, we can see what takes its place and whether it will be eligible?

We need more detail before we can advise further. So far i dont even know what the nomination looks like.

1 Like

the plate is the nomination… that I´ve made.. is next to the building but you cant see it in the google map.

the rejection even is a lie…Los revisores han dado estos motivos para no aceptar esta propuesta:

  1. El texto o la foto abusa, ridiculiza o acosa a una persona o grupo específico (NOT TRUE)
  2. El título contiene errores ortográficos o gramaticales, o no es preciso (ANOTHER LIE)

When reviewers know they want to reject a nomination, but don’t know what rejection to use, you will sometimes get rejection narratives that don’t make sense.

Based on the photo and location, this doesn’t look like anything eligible. Your rejection reasons confirm this - they aren’t a lie, they are just inaccurate. They are telling you that reviewers did not think this was eligible as a wayspot.

Ah, I see.

These do seem inaccurate. I agree with @salixsorbus Do you have the description and supporting information? I’m still not 100% sure what this plaque is about. And so far, it doesn’t look particularly eligible.

Also, is this a repeat submission? Appears that the rejection reason is different from the first one you received in the first instance (rejection because of school grounds).

I still don’t entirely get what is there to imagine on this plaque?

2 Likes