Hello,
I see another thread was opened that seems to be the same as this one:
I’ll respond here, as it’s best to keep topics contained to 1 thread.
While we don’t have many gates like this in the US, I don’t think the use of the words gate/gates is causing the rejection. To me, a gate at a place is meant to keep people out.
I recently reviewed a nomination that someone was trying to pass off as a walking path. However, the main photo and supporting photo showed a locked gate put up by the city utilities department, as this was actually a gas pipeline. It’s possible that some may be walking along the pipeline, but the gates are meant to restrict access and even warn others of the dangers beyond the gate.
So, it’s possible that gate could be causing the rejections, as the nomination I got had no mention of gate/gates, but I’ve also seen entry gates at stadiums and arenas in community review with gate in the title, so they’ve gotten passed ML. It could be more of ML seeing these gates at ineligible locations or unsafe locations.
Hopefully staff can take another look at these rejections, as they are of historical value, and as long as they are at publicly accessible locations, which they all appear to be, they certainly would be some fun things to explore.