Ot rejected for 'Temporary' and 'Blurry Photo' - Am I missing something here?

[Xenopus]

I’m having a hard time giving an opinion on the photo considering the text appears to be stretched and this possibly means the original photo is not like we’re seeing either?..

Checking IITC there doesn’t seem to have been a wayspot for the field back in May 2025, but if one has been approved since that could be one of the reasons. If not, as discussed above I’d suggest nominating the field itself - empirically, it’s been hard to make an argument for individual features of a single field to be eligible.

See here for more details on sports fields:

Sports Fields

Sports fields and athletic fields encourage exercise and socialization and are often good places to explore. It is important to choose a pin placement that respects and does not interfere with the sporting activity. See the image below for guidance. For sports fields with multiple points of play, there should be one nomination to encapsulate the entire field. [image] **Note that each sports field nominated needs to be distinct from others at the facility and have a unique title.