Please provide:
As you can see on google maps it stand there already more then 4 / 5 years, you can walk upstairs. And downstairs. Everbody whit a dog walks here, but it get rejected 2 times whitin 1 day, its a Painting of the middenmolendijk, dont know the artist or any more info, would this be a great poi? Never nominated art / painting like this before.
Any help, thought about this painting, dont have any appeals anymore
The description could use some improvement. Can you find any history on the painting? Who is the artist? Was it commissioned by someone/the town? How long has it been there? What exactly is it depicting? Why was it put there? If I were trying to submit this I would try to find out as much about it as I could to communicate to the reviewers that this is an important asset to the community. You may not be able to find all of the information but try to describe what the object is to the reviewers.
Its a picture of that excact spot before they started building the area full of houses, dont know who made it why its put there know its there for like 5 years or longer, there are a lot of artist here
And a lot of art route s poezie route historic routes, its hard to find the right info about it
With “Wayfarer criteria” as the rejection reason, this is likely being rejected by the ML (machine learning ai) model. Your email will say “our team” instead of the “community” and it will have been rejected around 20-24 hours after you made the nomination.
You need to take the best, clearest, most centered photo you can, so that it can detect something in the photo that might be eligible. This is a similar artwork that it accepted:
I also agree with the comment to include more information about the art and artist.
You get two appeals, each on a 20 day timer. When the time is up, you will be able to appeal again.
Think of it this way, if you cant explain the wayspot, why should the reviewer care about it? You have to be able to give the reviewer a reason to think its good other than, “hey, this exists and has been here for 5 years.”
What for one is good reason is for the other person not good reason, and some wayspots speak for them self… Yes painting of the middenmolendijk or the excat same location years ago, , and if it get accepted, players can always add extra information to inprove it
Thats great black white painting! And easy for the ML
Yes the ML Rejected it, yes only 2 and i need to appeal almost everything, except trail markers
So i skipp this one just a waste of time and appeal.
Like ad the bench whit scenic view i add super much info even about https://kinderdijk.nl/ thats a world unesco heritage that you can see from the bench also get rejected 3 times, so sorry i dont believe people care about mine nomination s extra information
Did you snap this photograph yourself? It seems very liw quality and has a black bar on top as though its a screenshot.
Its a screenshot made of mine own pictures so i can cut it to better size where it only show more the painting, and yes when i zoom in the qaulity is very low, but other way its to far and then it get rejected of to much nature / green in it, emelie or the ml rejected it very fast,when the cut the grass i can stand in front of it and make better picture. Close up
And yes always make self pictures even whit the worse camera 
not everyone can affort expensive phones or cameras i can add all orginal pictures here if you want/need
Is relaxing to do to make pictures
