Two trail markers rejected without stated reason

Two of my nominations for trail markers were rejected by the community. No reason is given on the contributions page. I would like to know why


Hey @wooperIooper ,

Have you tried reloading the page to see if the rejection reasons appear?

Was it rejected by “our team”? If not, F5 is your best friend here.

On the off chance that it’s that, did you follow the link from your rejection email to access this nomination?

I have, one of them was rejected at least a week ago

I did not

I’ll look into it. I see that the reasons selected were temporary and not meeting criteria.

The community cannot select this as a rejection reason. I have been asking for this reason to be added back in ever since the current review flow went live.

Although another possibility is for the reviewers, and indeed the submitter, to select one of four options, that is, “is this a great place to (1) explore, (2) exercise (3) socialise or (4) none of the above?”

But we were told in the November 2023 AMA that one of the first four reasons must be used to reject a nomination.

If you thumbs down those three questions and “Submit”, you do not get a pop-up that you have rejected the nomination.

This is not an option, but I assume you mean to thumbs down all three by this.

I had similar to this a while back as well, trail marker, rehected by community but no reason given, think mine was also “doesnt emet criteria” when a nia rep looked it up

So the real question now is, has it changed, does three thumbs down mean we are rejecting a nomination?

It has not changed. What @cyndiepooh posted is still what you have to do to reject a nomination,.

If you only thumbs down Exercise, Social and Explore, and “Submit”, you have accepted the nomination.