I already provided evidence that they do not own the driveway. The property is landlocked.
The trail and the driveway appear to be one and the same, up until the trail diverges.
If the homeowner did not have the right to post a sign there, it should definitely be removed. You are not trespassing on their property unless you continue past where the trail branches off.
I donât think that is true at all. The black line clearly delineates the property line.
That is also likely false. The property owner has every right to post a no trespassing sign and have it respected. There are no signs or anything else contradicting the no trespassing.
Also,
This is incorrect. I search the county property records and the driveway is part of the plot.
Just in case there is any question
Which black line are we talking about? I see a lot of black lines that delineate very clear property lines.
If that sign was posted by the municipality, then yes, as the property owner they would have that right.
Then feel free to provide that evidence, because the gis maps clearly donât reflect that.
Done
Thatâs the property to the north of the trail.
No, that is the exact property that you are talking about. The driveway is clearly part of the parcel 2A and private. There is zero evidence to the contrary.
I am not going to continue to argue the obvious, but the OP now has more evidence than they probably ever anticipated to support their appeal 
If thatâs the driveway youâre talking about, it explains why youâre confused. I am not talking about that driveway, as it clearly is not owned by Westtown Township. In your image, this is #2:
I am talking about the trail which also provides the owner access to #3, given that they are landlocked, and which is part of the park.
Here is another map of the aforementioned trail.
