Dear, a few of us try to put some wayspots in a specific area. After the wayspots become pokestops, they get removed within a few days. Even when good wayspots, they dissapear.
We already know the Wayfarer who keeps reporting these. We would like to know if there are some consequences to those actions? We know this Wayfarer has multiple accounts… It’s makes us quite angry since he already screamed at me in person.
When wayspot got incorrectly removed, you can appeal to reinstate it. Please provide the name and estimate location. You can provide evidence like foto that thewayspot still exist
Indeed that bridge. We know the person reporting is doing this with malicious intend… He doesn’t like new pokestops in that area, since my friend is living there.
It is one thing knowing (or believing) for yourself that a specific person is falsely removing wayspots, but sometimes something else is happening.
I still cannot see anything that makes the removal of this wayspot legitimate. I think Niantic need to look at the removal report that caused this to see if it was abusive.
Can you provide current photos or a video of the location to assist with that? Something that can be guaranteed to be current - including something in the video (a newspaper, this thread). It isn’t possible to know what evidence the removal report had on it, but if it was false images (just a possibility), it helps to have evidence overturning that.
Also, if you have other wayspots that have been removed, please post the details including coordinates. It is worth getting a second opinion before reporting the removals as abusive, and this forum is the best place to do that.
It was a challenge, but here is al picture of the bridge with the date.
We will provide info of a few other spots that have been removed in the area. Some of them we’re legimated removed (despite malicious intend), but I’ll provide the other ones.
That’s an example of why it helps to get a second opinion, because it would be unhelpful to include the removal of that wayspot in a report about abuse, since it was correctly removed.