What does "Submitter Identifiable" mean as a rejection criteria?

[l3artosz]

[Gendgi]

It typically means a reviewer thinks they could identify you or thinks you left “calling cards” to indicate it was your submission. It might be used if your reflection is visible one of your photos or you put “thanks, l3artosz” in your support text.

Or it could be a misclick or misunderstand of criteria for the person(s) who rejected.

[paulingzubat]

Hello and welcome!

I hope the above reply has answered your original question. I also noticed the “Generic Business” rejection.

Unique Art

Works of art and architecture encourage exploration and reflect the communities where they are found and their values. Art Works of art are generally eligible so long as they are unique, distinct, and permanent. This can include indoor artwork (framed and murals) and museum exhibits that are intended to be permanent. Nominators should use the official title and credit the artist when possible. They should tell the story of the work, explaining the cultural context. Submitters should make use …

While this has the similarities from the last example that it resembles a hammer, the sign is used throughout the chain store’s branches. It would be reviewed similar to the golden arches of a chain restaurant.

[PEPEDIZ2]

Eso me pasó a mi en varias ocasiones hasta que me di cuenta de los errores que estaba cometiendo a la hora de quitar las fotos, por un lado tuve que darme cuenta de la marca de agua que por defecto traen todos los teléfonos activada y por otro lado a la hora de quitar las fotos había otros dos detalles de los que no me daba cuenta y eran por un lado salía mi sombra y por otro la colocación de la mano en el teléfono que salían en algunas ocasiones los dedos en la foto, es cuestión de acostumbrarse y esto si que no tiene apelación, está muy claro.

[cyndiepooh]

I had one sign get rejected twice for submitter identifiable before I asked someone what was happening, and @Gendgi was the one to point out that my reflection was showing in the matte sign clearly enough for someone to identify me in the full resolution photo

I know to check for reflections in glass, but I did not know to check a painted sign…

[DTrain2002]

I remember submitting a LFL, and after checking it in Contribution Management, I could see my reflection in the glass a little too well. I withdrew the nomination, because I don’t want people to recognize me.

Also, I agree that this appears to just be a hardware store, and having a mascot doesn’t necessarily make it eligible. Many small businesses have mascots these days, as it’s not hard to get one drawn, but I don’t consider a hardware store a great place to be social/exercise/explore. I would’ve rejected for generic business.

[PEPEDIZ2]

También hay muchísimas fotos en las que se ven personas y no deberían verse, ni en la principal ni en la secundaria, las fotos sin personas y sin reflejos (me rechazaron una nominación hace unos días por eso y al ir a apelarla me di cuenta y ya no hice la apelación.)