Basically, im curious what peopel think are acceptabel and not for maps. Rhe reason i wonder is a saw a lot of wee housing estate maps in game, and when i say wee i mean like a street or 2 big maps. Me personally i wouldnt accept them. A large housing estate or scheme id say yeah. Obviosily naps of parks, zoos, cities, trails etc are yes. But would say, an industrial estate be a yay or a nay?
I normally read these as anchor points for the actual thing it maps.
Unless the housing / industrial estate has something unique then I would say no.
Parks / views / cities / trails will usually have extra info and not just the map. These I would consider.
I would consider large housing estates because somwtimes they are useful to not get lost, but yeah, the rest id agree with
I really would need to see the map in question to make a statement.
2 Likes
I’d like to get rid of all maps because I find them to be uninteresting noise.
See what happened when I tried to sneakily argue against them by making my own hoping they would get rejected:
1 Like
I believe each should be reviewed individually. Some map are more artistic then other.
fwiw, i just saw these on the nearby check, which i think are examples of ones that should not have been accepted
and in the same nearby check, this one that i would have
