I don’t know what is going on, but these days I’m having a lot of problems to get things accepted in my area.
Can someone please tell me why this nomination is not acceptable?
Title: Mapa Luis Landetxo en Kukularra
Description: Panel informativo que muestra un mapa del barrio Luis Landetxo.
Supplemental Info: En el alto de Altzaga se encuentra el barrio Luis Landetxo, una barriada con una amplia oferta de servicios municipales. En este mapa se pueden ubicar las diferentes residencias, zonas infantiles, polideportivos, etc disponibles para el uso público. Visible en streetview. Muchas gracias.
Since when an Informational Sign with a map containing information of the neighborhood, near playground areas, sports center and so on is not acceptable? What do they mean with temporary or seasonal, or not distinct?
They just have to take a look to streetview as stated in my supporting info to see that this panel has been there since 2008, and that in was renewed around 2022… so it is not temporary.
Please can someone from the Staff take a look to this nomination? I don’t know what is going on but almost all things I’m nominating are getting rejected because of nothing…
Title: Mapa noroeste de Zamalanda
Description: Mapa que muestra la distribución del parque y sus servicios.
Supporting Info: Este mapa es de gran utilidad para todos los asistentes, fomenta la exploración de la zona y es un punto de reunión en el que poder socializar. Parque de reciente construcción. Hay nueva foto 360 disponible, por favor revisad bien el enlace. Gracias. https://maps.app.goo.gl/e9W1wCr8y2r4WixJ6
“Not permanent or distinct” is a misleading narrative that doesn’t correspond very well to what reviewers choose as the reason for rejection. There’s a thread somewhere which discussions the rejection narratives.
I’d take both that and “temporary” to mean reviewers didn’t like the submission and then try to work out what could be improved - don’t worry about the specific rejection narrative.
I can’t see anything obvious, except /maybe/ reviewers thought it wasn’t accessible since it’s behind a barrier and the seating is hiding in the background - a supporting photo from the direction you show in the first streetview image would solve that.
From what is visible and the context you gave, this map is only showing the area as generic information ?
That would be ineligible as it does not fulfill any of the 3 core criteria enough. The reviews would focus on the rejection reason on their end saying “not distinct”, they did not reject for being temporary then, despite what your result says. The selection and result text are currently misaligned.
An Informational sign with information pointing to Playground Areas and the sport center is generic information? For me, it helps to explore the area and points you to places where you can exercise…
EDIT: By the way, I got a few like this accepted after appealing…
