I will add my quote that I stole and paraphrased from someone on these forums.
Explain why someone would pass similar locations to go to this one?
Rural locations may get an extra point if you can show that its the only place that serves certain meals, types of food in the town / county / country?
Yeh the speciality to explore the resturant is becuz of its greenary , much restaurant don’t have it but this has, pedestrian can obviously access,accurate, safe is everywhere,how can i make restuarant into a place for exercise, it’s social anyways,
So what kind of highlight can i ise for describing the place
And
For explaining it to reviewers
Can u distinguish which one for which from my above chat is u can😅i know asking over n over
Looks like you are already getting some great advice on how to do a better description for your restaurant nomination. I just wanted to clarify a couple of things:
a good nomination only needs to meet one of the eligibility criteria (great to exercise/explore/socialize). So I wouldn’t worry about trying to tie in exercising at all on this one. Up to you if you want to include explore if it applies. But definitely socialize.
Upgrades are independent of the ML bot. I would not recommend adding an upgrade too quickly for many reason that we can discuss elsewhere —but save your upgrade for a few days. Note that an upgrade does not speed up your review either, it just sends it to a wider pool of reviewers.
Yes you should resubmit. Fresh nomination with fresh photos.
The ML will not approve your submission but it’ll probablly stop filtering yours out for not meeting criteria.
You need a good photo of the location. You need a supporting photo which shows the same location in a wider context.
Your title has to be accurate.
What the ML might proof additionally isn’t something we know but you need to come over that first hurdle to get your nomination in front of human reviewers (community or team).
I have a doubt ,does an old gym that ninatic created themselves gets in count for 2-5 stops for 1 gym criteria or this criteria is for new gyms made through wayfarer submission? Just want to know cuz if i nominate two stops if it shows up does that mean there won’t be any gym from it cuz of existing gym in lvl 14?
To my understanding every wayspot (pokestop or gym, selfmade or imported) you can see ingame (not the hidden) counts to that gym creation rule.
But I’m not an expert. I’ll tagg @cyndiepooh and @TjoeMi maybe they can help better.
“A kerala style food that embodies the taste of nature in it, which the local and tourists crave to try whenever they visit by. The restaurant is one of famous spots here ,cause of rice packed in banana leaf and their special beef liver masala and many other versatile food With the ambience of greenery outside and the neatness that attracts the trust of visitors”
Is this okay for description? I wonder if anything else should i add as proof for it being a socialization place or explorable?
Do i need to add extra details for supplimentary info or explain certain phrases like someone above mentioned,why that?i hope all these brian storming won’t go rejected if ur guys are sure about this highest chance to get accepted
But it ain’t sponsored but created by ninantic long ago.does that also count? Well does these gym also count in this 2-5,6-19, etc.. stops to get a gym?
" the restaurant is accessible for the tourists and local who gather to try their signature dishes like beef liver masala and many versatile dishes.as for the ambience the greenery is like a cherry on top with steaming fresh food and u can trust the place for it’s neatness just like the delicious native flavour in it that lures the travellers compare to local restaurants at here"
What else can i use to polishing it using the above chats of mine and details?
I’d use something like this for supporting informations:
The Achoos Hotel Restaurant met the criteria of “socializing” for a good wayspot. Locals and tourists alike are impressed by the value for money, as reflected in a 4.2-star Google review.
Your chosen location seems to be correct from what I can see here