Why do I even appeal?

Nomination Support
1

I described the signficance of this house by even entering Wikipedia-Articles where the historic relevance of this building is described. Even appealed Niantic says it’s a normal house. How can this be?

Wayspot Submission for Ehemaliger Herrensitz

Heroldsberg BY

Not Accepted

2024-07-10

Niantic Note

Thanks for the appeal, Explorer! The object in question does not meet the Wayfarer criteria as it is a normal house which has no significance. If this assessment is not accurate, please resubmit the nomination with additional context. We recommend you review the Wayspot Criteria before submitting your next Wayspot contribution: Wayfarer — Niantic Technical Support and Help Center

Rejection Criteria

Wayfarer criteria

Generic Business

384×512 84.3 KB

Description

Die grundrechtlichen Ansprüche in diesem Areal erwarben Heinrich und Konrad Geuder im Jahre 1391. Die Geuder erbauten 1614 das bis heute erhaltene Herrenhaus und behielten den Besitz bis 1661. Das historische Gebäude ist gut erhalten und dient heute als normale Wohnbehausung und ist als Baudenkmal ausgewiesen.

Location

Kleingeschaidt 25, 90562 Heroldsberg, Deutschland

Supplemental Information

384×512 77.2 KB

Ort ist frei zugänglich und liegt an der Hauptstraße in Kleingeschaidt. Die historische Relevanz ist ebenfalls in Wikipedia dokumentiert: Kleingeschaidt – Wikipedia (siehe zweiter Absatz unter dem Oberpunkt Geschichte, ebenfalls erwähnt unter Baudenkmäler als Haus mit der Nr. 25)

2

If you would like feedback on the nomination itself, it would be great if you can share more details.

As from the picture it looks similar to single family private residential property, but cannot really judge if that is true.

3

Sorry your answer was really fast, I did edit it though

4

If this is SFPRP (single family private residential property) then it is ineligible, historical or not

Edited to add a link to the clarification:

1 Like
5

Thanks for providing more details!

Based on the extra information I see a building with a single house number, which is not for an appartment complex so this would indeed appear to be a single family private residential property, which is the first rejection reason.

The rejection criteria are always more important than acceptance criteria, hence it was rejected.

2 Likes
6

Thank you for your opinions and views. So the rejection is correct but the reasons like generic business or normal house are not. Okay.

7

Well it indeed is a bit confusing, but with normal house they likely meant SFPRP. Hope this clarifies things for you.

8

As I said thank you very much for the clarification

1 Like