I submit 2 next to each other here without any pedestrian access from a vacation in Pittsburgh, PA.
Ohio Fort Pitt Block House :
40.441188, -80.009825 (actual)
Forbes Road
40.441098, -80.009966 (actual)
Pittsburgh
United States of America
True, these are on a state park. However, the fact that these are surrounded by a locked gate with signs stating Private Property means one of two things to me. A person has to climb the fence or cut the lock to be able to reach either. I did not know the marker for the first was placed incorrectly or would have done a location edit. I did a location edit to place the smaller Wayspot exactly where it is located. Since these can very rarely if ever be visited on foot, I do not believe these should have been accepted. I wish to appeal the expected and received rejected decision for each Wayspot. I knew to take pictures since I am several states away and no longer on vacation.
As long as someone is able to access the wayspot safely there is no reason for removing this wayspots based on their location on private property. Please note that private property is different than private residential property, for which rejection reasons are applicable.
Forbes Road is not where you say it is either… its at 40.4410720, -80.0096505 slightly east of where its placed now but def not within the gates you place it in
I actually looked on Google Maps and see hours for this/these locations on Saturday mornings. I visited Point State Park on a Thursday. I guess I reject my own appeal. This can be done for Fort Pitt Block House and maybe the other. I must better search for the location of the other Wayspot again.
Thanks for the appeal, @1Todoelmundo. We took another look at the Wayspots in question and decided that they do not meet our criteria for removal at this time.