I know people select ridiculous rejection reasons for the sake of it, but can someone help me make sense of these rejection reasons?
Private property is stup d for sure, temporary is in the same reason as distinct though so I suppose they meant the latter
1 Like
We have been told that “Temporary or not Distinct” can be used to reject mass produced objects. I can’t explain the “Private Property” rejection, but a lot of people misunderstand that one.
2 Likes
The Victorian Stinkpipes are defintely not mass produced, especially if you compare them to the likes of Trail Markers, Lamposts and UK Postboxes. But still doesn’t make much sense.
Probably read it as a vote for “didnt meet criteria”
2 Likes
I am not arguing for or against stinkpipes. They seem like infrastructure to me as a US citizen. I simply tried to explain the rejection. Will leave this to @frealafgb <3
2 Likes
Stinkpipes used to be regularly accepted pre-ML, similar to older postboxes. Nowadays they struggle
1 Like
Indeed private property is not correct. I had to google “stink pipe”, never heard of it.
I guess technically it is just infrastructure, but on the other hand as it is from the 19th century it can be considered antique, and if you wait long enough old stuff will become more interesting.
So I actually think this should be approved.