I Myself have a similiar story by the topic.
I and my mum got fully incorrect warnings, claiming that adding „My photos, from my old phone” (ML kept incorrectly rejecting photos extracted via onedrive as third party, making my extreamly low rejection rate (normally about one per ten or twenty nominations) way higher (up to half rejected) and when appealing these all i got was that „it’s a part of our anti-abuse program” or something in that shape) into supporting information is „INFLUENCING REVIEVERS”. And that makes no sence. Influencing revievers is saying „Please move this to the left location, it will free up this cell/Portal”. When my mum appealed, from what i understand the answer she got was basically Yes but rejection criteria (Also got correct nominations like „Historical Sign - Opening of the Train Station in (…)” but in polish, with the photos being of said sign, rejected by the Wayfarer team right before the incorrect warn for „Incorrect Name”, and so on. And these were used as the argument not to revert the decision.) Both of these warns were around 20 and 10 days ago. That fully discourages me, who started playing both games just to add more wayspots, from trying to add anything. I got 1 warn last year that I understand, and a 2nd one that i see as controversial. However i fully understand why these two were placed. Now these new warns are just…. I don’t even know what to call it.
When i started adding, i hoped that wayfarer would only evolve into something better and better, maybe even bring infinite nominations back (Would love that). With these warns, that doesn’t seem to be the case.