Yea. Not to mention multiple rejection one so that there is no consensus. Its very confusing.
Could you please do some screenshots of the reviewing screens when you do some reviews (which options are choosable)?
I think about a follow up thread to look where they’re not reflecting the choosen option and how we would suggest to make it better.
1 Like
Natural feature isnt even a rejection reason anymore (which is good, cause scotalnd has loads of rock formatuojs and waterfalls that are named and would make great waypoints, like the whangie or the devils pulpit)
Edit, just adding, emily defo doesnt like natural features, rejects anythifn woth too mcuh grass or sky lol, and she rejected the whangie so im stuck waiting for an appeal to see if niantic will reject them or not)
2 Likes
Now I want to see the Devil’s Pulpit! Sounds amazing! Hopeful you can find a way to get these submitted successfully but it will likely just gain us a better understanding of all the “natural feature” rejection options 
If it makes it sou d more appealing, the whangie, in scottish folklore was created bynthe devil swinging his tail in anger lol
I also want to go tk the devils pulpit, its now kn my list of potential walks, ive been doing hill walks and looking for other walks to do
1 Like
Items reviewers can choose to reject a nomination:
“MARK AS DUPLICATE” button
Appropriate: Private property, Adult location, Schools, Sensitive location, Obstructs emergency operations, Generic business
Permanent and Distinct (no options or text box to explain)
Safe (no options or text box to explain)
Accuracy: must further choose from Bad Photos, Bad Title, Bad Description, Abuse, Inaccurate Location, text field to enter other reason - no further checklist for Inaccurate location or text box, but must choose for others (can select multiple in this section)
Bad Photos options: Blurry photo, Face or body parts, License plate, Orientation, Submitter identifiable, Third party photo, Watermark, Low quality or inaccurate photo
Bad Title options: Emoji or emoticon, URL or markup, Low quality or inaccurate title
Bad Description options: Emoji or emoticon, URL or markup, Low quality or inaccurate description
Abuse options: Fake nomination, Explicit Content, Influencing Reviewers, Offensive, Other abuse-related reasons
As far as we know, none of these actually reject a nomination:
1 Like
Thank you sooo much 
Give me some time to make something out of it
1 Like
Oh, man! Those Niantic programmers seem to have a lot of trouble keeping the sense of affirmation and negation straight.
Do you want to end the review? (Select No if you DO want to end the review)
Would you not disagree?
need to be able to react with both 
and 
Here it is: follow up
