I agree with @cyndiepooh that this looks more intentional to include this person. That begs the question why were they included?
I am very care even with supporting photos that seem to include extraneous objects. These may be included as a signal to a group that this should be accepted.
The content changes, but not the existence of the board.
However, as is, I would reject because its definitely not interesting in its current configuration. There is one around here in a similar state that Iāve purposely not submitted.
Is this in direct reply to the board in this post?
The reply feature may be muddling things and I just want to be sure.
I donāt think Iād give a direct answer based on the example given. I have no issue approving a notice board that is empty (as you said, āThe content changes, but not the existence of the boardā) - thatās the one thing that remains permanent. However, I would want to look at the support photo a little more closely or the area it is at. In my own region, notice boards usually have awnings or protective plastic/glass covers to keep the content dry I understand that isnāt true everywhere, but Iāve also seen privacy fences or such paneling installed to block unsightly infrastructure. So, I think Iād want to make sure that this isnāt just a partial fence of some kind.
I donāt think thatās too critical and Iām not asking for a notoriety to verify. Just want to be a little cautious since posted fliers are what I usually use as evidence of intended community use.
Edit to add: And also verify who/what āKarmiaā is to make sure somebody isnāt slipping in a personal or player name unrelated to the candidate.
Iāve had āsubmitter Identifiableā content locally where somebody included their child in every photo. To be honest, at this point I forget if it was main photo or support photo, but it does happen. The content was otherwise (a bit lazy but) acceptable, but I continued to reject until they stopped using those photos. I also remember a dog in some and seen shared publicly hats, bikes, selfies, etc. Iāll also admit Iām not always consistent - in part it will depend on the overall nomination.
If the supporting photo has people obviously associated with the submitter, pets, bikes, cars or any other item belonging to the submitter then it should be rejected IMO. Of course, reflections can also be a cause for rejection. It seems harsh, but if you are doing it accidentally then itās something youāll learn real quick.
I would not approve it. It all looks propped. The person in the wheelchair and the folded up picture or maybe poster. Also you can tell that is a home. Iām sorry not trying to be rude in anyway, but I would reject this. I have many more reasons.