This is the kind of thing that I would just let slide. It is a waste of the supporting information, but the prompt does ask why this pokestop would be important. That seems like a reasonable answer from someone who doesn’t know any better.
thanks
okay that one i might reject as submitter identifiable with the person on the bike - see if someone else answers
if for example you see someone far away but in the support information image it’s fine right?
yes. the only reason i have a problem with this person is that it looks like the person was intentionally included in the nomination.
why would someone want to include someone
you can always skip if you don’t feel good about the nomination either way. a person could be included to indicate to friends who get this to review to accept it, even if it doesn’t meet criteria. i am not good with abuse stuff, so if i am not certain, i skip.
oh i see
i don’t have any problem at all with that one. for body parts, i think more of a finger in the photo.
Even though that’s a supporting photo rather than primary?
yea I think beacuse it’s suspicious
i said might, and wanted other opinions. i take it you don’t see an issue with the person featured there. i always look at the entire nomination and we were discussing things that might be influencing reviewers.
oh and about that board
:->
Maybe if they were holding a sign saying “Please approve this spot!”
lcn replying…
lol the sign in the supporting propped up somewhere i would let slide most likely, but featuring someone in the photo is something i would consider letting reviewers know who you are.