Double standard?

Wayspot Appeals
1

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

  • Wayspot Title: wandelknooppunt 11
  • Location (lat/lon):51.433372, 5.568307
  • City: Geldrop
  • Country:Nederland

On the old forum this specific portal was decided to retire.
It has been submitted again. But it has also been a ruling that if a portal has been retired it should stay retired. Why is that not the case here?

1000009611
10000096111080×1241 150 KB

So would you look into this please @NianticAaron
Why is it that a portal in an other city is retired and is not allowed to be re submitted. Because once retired it stays retired? But this portal is easily resubmitted and then stays?
It is not portal that meets criteria.
So please take an other look at this rejection.
@niantic

1 Like
2

A geotaged photo of the POI would help a lot

3

Is the portal mentioned.
As a minimum it should be set on proper location when not removed.

At least direct behind the lantern

IMG_3508
IMG_35081170×2532 419 KB

IMG_3507
IMG_35071170×2532 634 KB

4

It is nice to follow.

5

In an other case oh the old forum several wandelknooppunten came back on-line.

So nia said not in words. All wandelknooppunten are good to go now.

But I know the real reason of why the portal has removed.

Let’s make an other topic about wandelknooppunten.

8

1000019268
10000192681080×2400 176 KB

I think you got your mail back with you answer.

10

This topic is being closed to further posts for now.

2 Likes
11

Thanks for the appeal, Explorer. After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve decided to retire the Wayspot in question.