did you tag me? so you did get an appeal for this accepted?
In order to compete for gym quota in a L14 cell, false reports are submitted, and the officials approve them without proper verification.
This situation is exemplified by this case:
Gym name:九品貓頭鷹
Gym Location: 22.682507,120.30943
This owl sculpture is still in its location, situated beside the sidewalk, safely accessible, and a unique piece of art in this community. There is absolutely no reason for this Wayspot to be removed.
The attached image serves as proof that it was once a gym.
The attached image is a Google Street View of the owl sculpture at this location, serving as evidence that this object still exists.
There are countless disappointing examples: false reports, a flawed verification system, negligent staff, and an extremely unfriendly Taiwanese reviewer community. It is truly disheartening.
Did you get this Wayspot accepted? I have been using this post as an example that imported Powerspots may be seen as duplicates by the appeals team. If this was accepted, then that is not the case.
No.
To be precise, it’s not this exact one, but it is an object from the same café.
Taiwan’s wayfarer review community has a high probability of rejecting all coffee shop proposals, including chain coffee shops and non-chain coffee shops, so I actually had the same coffee shop rejected by the staff review multiple times.
So I appealed another proposal for this cafe(忘言咖啡）and attach the link of this post to clearly stated that it is a duplicate power spot, not a duplicate wayspot.
Congrats, and thank you for posting. Now I am even more confused about the original decision. I guess we will never know.
1 Like
The unclear rules and negative attitude of the official have caused a sharp decline in the number of players. I have been playing this game for six years. I used to open Pokemon Go every day and spent a lot of money on this game. Now I haven’t played the game for three months.
The official never responded to this post, and I appealed again, and clearly stated in the appeal column that it was a duplicate powespot, not a duplicate wayspot, and also posted a link to this post, and finally the official approved