Another work of art giving value and honoring a deceased artist, and they don’t accept it.
What is your documentation on this one? It just looks like a business name to me.
Hi,
I have given this a different title as having 2 topics with the same title is confusing. If you would prefer something different please do edit.
I am also moving this and the other topic to Nomination Support as that is the best place to discuss individual nominations.
If you mean Frida Kahlo, doesn’t this say Fpida?
the name of the building is frida kahlo
Without seeing the actual nomination and knowing more about why it wasn’t accepted (reasons? community review, or ML bot?), it will be hard for anyone to help much.
I guess in an “artsy” way this is supposed to say “Frida”, not FPIDA. I would suspect, that without good supporting information, reviewers may fail to recognize this as art.
I see she was a prominent Mexican painter in the first half of the 20th century (per her Wikipedia page).
Personally, I’m interested in why the building was named after this artist. What’s the story here? Rather than the sign/art, perhaps the building itself is a worthy wayspot.
This should not have been accepted imo. They either got lucky that they got bad reviewers who accepted it, or they had information in the supporting that proved this is a work of art.
Don’t worry about posting the Wayspot here. Having been accepted, even incorrectly, this probably does not meet internal removal criteria.
You did not reply with this information when I first asked. And I said that they may have gotten it accepted if there was more to it than I could see.