I see the distinction as:
A apartment complex is safely accessible and even if you trespass you are unlikely to place yourself in harm’s way.
An industrial site may have heavy machinery, hazardous chemicals, and have federal ramifications for trespassing. It may be innately unsafe for yourself and put others at risk.
I shared a screenshot earlier where “industrial site” is called out as a rejection criteria.
My understanding is that the spot in question here does not have those safety concerns.
The topic of the last several comments in this chain have been about the complex itself and my reply strictly to your first sentence saying the same logic applies.
Apruebo es un mapa ubicado en un lugar fuera de peligro y cada jugador que pase por ahí lo va a agardey
The people who have permission to be on the property, employees, aren’t going to be going about exploring their worksite. It still needs to meet one of the three eligibility criteria, and saying that a worksite in an industrial area is a great place to explore is a very unconvincing argument . I know it’s a matter of opinion, but it does seem as though people stretch these concepts to the extreme in order to fit their POI into a game.
Having working in such places before, I would heartily disagree with that statement.
Also, some of these are places to socialize. That’s two of the Big Three.
Sorry, none of the things listed on this map are for socializing.
2 gates (entry & exit)
Lab
Human Resources building
Foundry
Warehouse
Loading area
Mechanical workshop
A place that does packaging
Amusingly, one of the wayspots around here is an entrance gate to a similar facility.
Anyway, I took the comment:
employees, aren’t going to be going about exploring their worksite
as a generality, and I responded in same. I most certainly have explored factories I’ve worked in, and they often do have places to socialize.