I haven’t been reviewing for 3-4 years, now I’m back and sometimes I’m getting terrible quality photos of nominations. For example, I just had a nomination there were trees and the object of interest was taking just 5% off the photo. It was taken from a 50-meter distance and I had a couple like that before. So should I allow that kind of nomination or what?
1 Like
“Bad Photos” now comes up as a reason if you do 
on Accuracy.
The 
tooltip about bad photos says:
The submission is NOT accurate or informative if:
Photo - includes one or more of emojis, tags, or personally identifiable information such as codenames, personal names or initials, or addresses; copyrighted material or watermarks, including screenshots of someone else’s photo; is obviously doctored; includes people, body parts, or live animals as the subject matter; is blurry, over/under exposed, taken inside a car, contains a watermark, or is improperly oriented.
So if you think that is the case when reviewing a nomination, you can select this reason and then the valid options from the list in the image.
1 Like
ah ok. Case closed then
Thanks