This is an old satellite image and it is an allotment association where young and old can relax in their allotments and also do gardening work, e.g. planting fruit and vegetables or fruit trees.
Green is the mural I submitted and was rejected
Blue are the 3 wayspots that are already there
Yellow is the club house of the allotment garden association
so who owns the land that the allotment is on? seems like its private property/ too close to private property
Here you are if the land belongs
so itâs all private property or owned by the government?
Correct
Okay, I thought you were simply playing around with pedantic language, but now youâre giving Kafka a run for his money.
Would it not be wiser to ask yourself âWhat is the author trying to do here?â rather than digging in and doubling down on every jot and tittle?
Given that all human beings are animals, and all insects are animals that have bodies, whether alive or dead, it would appear that we must not take any photos near the surface of this planet. Iâm pretty sure there must be some animalâs bodies everywhere you can look! In fact, arenât plants that utilize photosynthesis taking advantage of dna from a bacterium (an animal) that developed this key trait? Perhaps Emily was right: reject every photo that contains plant matter, too.
The rules were designed to deter Wayfarers from using recognizable features (friends, pets, friendsâ pets, petsâ friends, thumbs ups, pointy fingers, Richard pictures, feet up in front, etc.) to the detriment of photo quality, and at risk of the imposition of image-rights or licensing fees.
All that logic chopping you are doing is antithetical to Wayfarer. Itâs simply a means to punish people.
Reviewers seem to do that enough, by themselves. Do they really need Wayfarer Ambassadors modeling preposterous behavior like that?
