this is my submission for pokestop. I can confirm the location by uploading the video. Any penalty for the reviewer who give incorrect review for this case?
1 Like
now, i’m getting this warning ingame. Is this the way this game treat with the player who contribute 5-10 pokestops already?
You should have got one or more emails detailing the cause of the warning, which isn’t necessarily this wayspot submission.
Can you provide the location of the submission and the description + supporting text?
someone mark my submission as fake. This location is near my house. Anyway to report this reviewer please?
1 Like
Hello and welcome @duongnghia184
Thanks for posting this nomination and your warning
Nominations are reviewed by a number of fellow wayfinders - the number is not known.
So it was not just one person that had an issue with your nomination.
Your supplementary photo is not very helpful to the reviewer. The box and the mural should just be a small portion of this picture and you should aim to show box and its surroundings so people can workout where it is.
you can appeal the warning and send a link to the video evidence with that appeal
1 Like
https://maps.app.goo.gl/LnAP5cr22FV9vwnNA?g_st=ipc you can see a box at this location. it is a small house using to store electric machine. The pain is on its wall.
My submission:
In addition,
Having the nomination flagged it would have been reviewed by the wayfarer team. It was them that decided this was a fake.
okay. let me apeal and send video
I’m struggling to find a wall that matches up with the one in your pictures, so a video will most likely be very useful.
hold on. give me 12hrs. Tomorrow morning i will take video and send you. It is 8PM now
You can upload video in youtube and put the link here.
Things like this usually happen if reviewer cant confirm your nomination. So your video should include nearest confirmed street view up to nomination area
Good luck.
The submission photo needs to be of the object you are submitting
The supporting photo should include the object and be far enough away with enough surroundings that reviewers can tell where the object is.
That isn’t the case here. The photos are basically identical, which is … not ideal.
I think i reviewed this one, i did not report but did flag it as inaccurate.
The supporting image zoom out not much for me, and the location put in a location that i thought it was inaccurate and is not seen on google map.
If the mural was proven real, i deeply apologized for rejecting and making a false judgement and i am willingly to get any punishment.
1 Like
It is on the submitter to convince you that the nomination exists where they say it does. If you could not see any possibility that it could exist here, then you did nothing wrong. TY for letting the op know how this appeared to you in review.
3 Likes
You did nothing wrong. When the photos are identical, it is OK to be dubious.
Actually i will make a case why I think this location is inaccurate put(My judgement might be wrong)
So this is the location you put in nomination right. This is the electro box you claimed to be there, however there are some conflict:
- Why is electro box is near people house, it is dangerous right? If your location proven true, it is a dangerous building to be built not even the government wouldn’t dare to do that.
- Conflict location you provided, the location you provided in the forum conflict with the nomination location you put.
The electro box exist from what i see, but the location you put is wrong.
1 Like
This is quite normal, especially in my location of the UK…
Suppose they are working on the principle that it isn’t meant to explode 
2 Likes
I never seen that in my life not gonna lie, every electro box must be far away from anyone house around 50m-100m
I guess I learn more today.
1 Like
That’s right. The location seems to be off by almost fifty meters. The submitted location looks to be an SFPRP.