Need help with determining if those are good places to nominate

Nomination Support
3

That is a whole lot of stuff to go over in one post, and I am easily confused :blush:

1&2) I also feel like the bike repair station is generic infrastructure. But maybe someone who has more experience with bikes could help with that?

  1. It doesn’t matter if the public is allowed to use the school after hours. If it is on the grounds of a K-12 (children’s) school, then it is ineligible.

  2. “Wayfarer criteria” is usually an indication that the ML (machine learning ai) filter rejected this one. It is just what we call a “rules” sign, and does not meet the criteria of a great place for exercise, exploration, or being social.

  3. The training equipment was probably rejected because it was not seen as a significant (distinct) part of the park. The rule for playgrounds is that they should be submitted as a whole, and that is how reviewers seem to have judged this one. If you can provide information that this is a unique training station, you might be able to get it accepted, but every fitness station that I have had success with had a separate sign.

  4. I am surprised that the chess board sign was not accepted, but there may be something there that reviewers thought it was too similar too. I don’t see the sign or the field in your supporting photo to help show that it is there and is unique.

  5. The collection point sign is nothing that encourages exercise, exploration, or being social. Another kind of sign I would call a “rules” sign.

Hope this helps.

2 Likes