Hola a todos,
Escribo para saber porque fue marcada de “Duplicada” la propuesta del Wayspot.
Si bien existen otras canchas en el Polideportivo Sur, esta propuesta específica corresponde a una cancha de fútbol distinta e independiente. El complejo deportivo cuenta con varias canchas de diferentes tamaños y usos.
-
La cancha en cuestión (Cancha #1) es una cancha de fútbol grande.
-
Existe otra cancha más pequeña cercana, que podría ser el Wayspot existente con el que se ha comparado
-
Ubicación: 6.165517, -75.59967
Muchas gracias
Welcome to the forum!
We can’t really tell you why, but from what I can see on the web submit map, this is not actually a duplicate.
It could have possibly been mistaken for the Micro field. But I would accept this larger field separately.
You can either resubmit or appeal. If the email said “our team” instead of the “community” decided, then I might recommend an appeal. You get 2 appeals, each on a 15 day counter before you can use them again. The Appeal button will show up when you have one available.
If you do resubmit, you may want to say something in the supporting like “please note that this is a larger, separate field, and not the micro field which is already a Wayspot.” Saying something like “NOT A DUPLICATE” in the supporting section can make reviewers suspicious, so I always try to address issues like this in a positive way when I find I have to.
If this is actually designated as “Field #1” there, I would keep the title. If you just added the number, then I would make the title say that this is a full-sized or larger field, so it is easy to compare to “Cancha Sintetica Micro fútbol” - maybe call it a full-size court, or regulation court, or whatever seems appropriate.
Your supporting photo should not be the same as your main photo. Ideally, you should get a supporting photo that shows both fields to make it clear they are not the same field. Your main photo should have a level horizon, as orientation is a reason for rejection, too.
Good luck with this. Let us know how it goes!
3 Likes
Thanks for the answer and the tips. The email says ‘our team,’ so I’ll wait until I can appeal again.
Did you see this in “Under review” status with the Niantic balloon? Or did it get rejected as a duplicate about 24 hours after you submitted it? If it was the second one, it may have been the Machine Learning “automated process” rejecting it as duplicate. I was thinking that if it was that, then you may have to appeal to get human eyes on your nomination.
Was the second one, I can’t appeal and I don’t know when can do it.
The appeals have a 15 day reset before you can use them again. If you have the dates of your appeals you can check when it should be available. If you don’t, then you can count 15 days from now and should be able to appeal.
1 Like
