Non-sense wayspot rejection because it is a "normal" bench?

Hello,

I do agree that the title isn’t the best, as it describes the bench, not the view, which is most likely why it was rejected for inaccurate information. Yes, benches at scenic viewpoints and lookouts are eligible, and there is clarification on them:

You want to make sure you are nominating the viewpoint, not solely the bench. A title that translates to “large sofa, the trough” in English doesn’t describe the viewpoint and what people may see in the area. The description in English is “Nature point/park De Trog, with bench. Built by the Nature and Forest Agency,” so if it is a park, I would also try to focus on that.

I would also suggest better photos, similar to the ones in the seating benches criteria. A photo from behind the bench showing the view is going to be better than a photo of the front of the bench for the main photo.

1 Like