Just because a tile is placed by the city, it does not become eligible. If this is part of a hiking trail (as highlighted by you), please provide an official link in support of your claim and we will re-evaluate our decision. Thanks,
I found your comment a bit confusing, rather than enlightening.
In the past ‘eligible’ merely meant that something didn’t run afoul of the rejection criteria and could therefore be considered for approval.
The entire puzzle-plaque program appears designed to produce interesting stuff to search out and explore in public spaces. It has the definitional quality of being interesting, public, artistic, and documented. This makes it difficult for me to understand your position.
Every reviewer or algorithm must check each nomination against the rejection criteria and the acceptance criteria. Is there an additional bar that government-installed art projects must pass lest they become ineligible?
I thought everything that was not ineligible was potentially eligible, and that public art that didn’t violate the rejection criteria was quite solid.
So the tiles are not placed by cityhall to explore? But placed as a regular tile?
Poezie is not a art ?
Since they are numberd in a way to follow. Its not a route?
Blockquote @elijustrying your hearth comment dont make sense,
Do you mean the heart reaction I gave to Aaron’s post?
It is meant to indicate a thankyou for posting what I thought indicated
Consideration of your posting and helpful advice as to what they needed to see if they were to review it to approve.
Often wayfinders have a simple rejection of an appeal with no indication of why or what would have helped - which can be frustrating for those wayfinders. I thought this was a positive step.
Personally I like all sorts of walking trails as I think they are a great way to encourage people to get out and about.
I also think that you need a way for a non-local to verify it is a trail so I take care when I find trails to provide links.
If a website has been removed, can it be found on the web archive the wayback machine ?
No idea how that work. Or look back information. I made a topic 1 september. Where there where no response, i understand your meaning of the hearth now i had a difftent view about the hearth, but is nice this time a response
Then it was accepted in appeal in wayfarer and the link of cityhall was still working, but since the expositie was ended they remove it from the website. And all available information i can find already shared. Because of the expositie and information about they renewd all the tiles from the poezieroute in 2022 it was easy to find all poezietiles and some that where not a wayspot, i nominate as new wayspots.
There are 45 poezie markers in the form of a tile or sign whit poëzie tekst.
And part of niantic team also accepted them in appeal, and then there is the other half of the team that ignore the information shared and just remove them as regular tile. While its art and a route. Intended to explore and read the art of poëzie.
So yes is frustrating to spend time on this, convincing someone while you share multiple times all the information.
Only reason i try one more time is because it benefits all the players here true the hole town and its nice to walk, instead of only being able to walk to playgrounds
For example, they collaborated on a birthday calendar project and created a route of 45 ‘poetry tiles’ through Ridderkerk. They also wrote 15 poems together for bicycle junction signs
Thanks for making the page available again @hankwolfman
And if you can find the youtube movies on this page it show the poëzie route tiles in a movie clip.
My understanding is that there are specific exclusion criteria, so anything that meets one of those is automatically ineligible. For everything else, they are subject to the three eligibility criteria. Not everything that is not (apologies for the double negative) automatically excluded is then eligible. As you say, they might be potentially eligible, but many POIs that do not meet the exclusion criteria also do not meet any eligibility criteria. For example, basic city infrastructure like a random sidewalk…… doesn’t meet exclusion criteria but also doesn’t meet any eligibility criteria.
@NianticLC under witch reason you reject it? Explain it please? @NianticAaron told me if i can proof its part of a hiking trail to follow? Stand there a trail of 45 markers