As shown in above image, supporting information as per Wayfarer criteria is appropriate or inappropriate?
I ignore this kind of supporting statement. I wish they would reword the prompt.
2 Likes
This is definitely useless, but doesn’t get into anything malicious or influencing (at least as a one-off and in the part before it is cut off).
Indirectly, they are shooting themselves in the foot by losing the possibility to use this space to instead clarify how their object meets criteria or provide any proof that might be helpful to demonstrate the existence or relevance of said object. Up to the reviewers to see if they can confirm it nevertheless.
As Cyndie said, a big part of poor supporting info usage comes from how the nomination flow in games is worded.
3 Likes
Got it, Reporting such supporting information be useful or it’s simply skip-able?
…game with full benefits.
My doubt is that we can report such supporting information or it’s skip-able?
It looks like someone has simply misunderstood what the prompt is for…
There is nothing there to report in my opinion, unless there is something else in the statement that you did not show us.
If you were thinking “influencing reviewers” I don’t think that applies. I think they were just answering the question of why this would be a good pokestop in the prompt.
2 Likes
Got it.
Got it thanks for the reply @everyone.
1 Like
Yep, what @cyndiepooh said - nothing malicious.
Got it. Thanks