Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
Additional Information (if any):
Hello everyone. I’m contacting you here on the forum because I see that the reviewers’ opinions are inconsistent. Here are two screenshots showing that the reviewers told me the proposal could be temporary, and I’m providing screenshots of my contributions showing that the same location has been there since at least 2020 or earlier.
The “temporary” rejection text does not mean what you think (!)
This comes up when when reviewers select “NO” to “Permanent and Distinct”. This will be done because a submission appears temporary or because the submission is simply something that doesn’t deserve to be a wayspot.
When a submission cannot be rejected for Appropriate, Safe or Accuracy, but doesn’t meet criteria and you want to explicitly reject it, rejecting for “Permanent and Distinct” is the recommended action.
Hi @4lulz
Welcome to the forum
I’ve moved your topic to Nomination Support because the category Wayspot Appeals is for appealing rejected removal requests or to ask for reinstating removed wayspots.
