El titulo y descripción de ambas propuestas no le veo nada malo
Las dos fotos también son correctas cumplen que se vea la propuesta concreta,
La ubicación de la primera está cerca a un puente colonial y la otra está en la esquina de una calle que lleva hacia el cementerio general por eso la forma de vela que tiene. Sinceramente no me gusta enviar una propuesta dos veces, se que las propuestas que envío son aceptables y solo es cuestión de tiempo para que se acepten pero no me gusta enviar una propuesta dos veces porque fue rechazada por la comunidad pero ahora fue rechazo automático, osea si lo envío de nuevo es probable que pase lo mismo así que necesito alguna solución o sugerencia. Gracias.
Hi @1sebas45
I’ve moved your topic to Nomination Support because the category Wayspot Appeals is for appealing rejected removal requests or to ask for reinstating removed wayspots.
These were rejected by ML, not by the appeals team, so there’s no need to tag staff to have them take another look. At this point, the OP will either have to resubmit or appeal, as the Appeal button is available on them.
@1sebas45 I do like the first one, but the main photo could be taken a little better. Try taking it at a different time of the day, so there is less glare, and try to make sure that there isn’t a motorcycle in the shot, as it’s unneeded.
The 2nd one to me looks like it could be a harder sell, as it seems like it could be used as a bus stop, so it may be seen as infrastructure. If you do resubmit, try to explain how this is a good place to be social. I would also crop the photo to focus on the stop, as you don’t need the tall building in the background and not much of the other smaller building in there either.
You didn’t post the location and supporting info/photos, and those could also be an issue that needs to be reworked before resubmitting, if that’s what you choose to do. It could be that you may need a better supporting photo showing more of the area and the POI together, or there was an issue with where the location pin was placed. If you’re comfortable with posting this info, please feel free to do so.
Y bueno ¿que es ML?
Tengo mis motivos para no apelar ya que me paso que al aceptar la apelacion, terminan modificando ligeramente la ubicación y termina en una celda ocupada y quisiera evitar eso (la ubicacion de ambas propuestas es exacta pero estan al limite de la celda disponible), por eso estaba pidiendo ayuda para saber cual fue el motivo de rechazo automatico, para enviarlo nuevamente evitando incumplir el criterio que haya cometido
ML is the AI system that checks every submission within 24 hours; ML stands for “Machine Learning.” If it passes ML, it either goes on to community voting or staff reviews it.
You have to accurately place your nominations, as manipulating the map is considered abuse. So, placing a nomination in an empty S2 cell but it’s actually in an occupied one could lead to a warning/ban.
You have to remember that Wayfarer is for adding Wayspots to the database map, and each game decides which of those Wayspot end up in their games. Placing Wayspots incorrectly is listed as possible abuse in both the ToS and Player Guidelines, as well as submitting fake data in the Abuse Enforcement info. So, the appeals team was correct in moving the appealed nomination to the correct location, as accuracy of the map is important and inaccurate locations are not allowed.
