What are we supposed to reject nominations before for not meeting the criteria, since we can’t reject it for not meeting the criteria? I’ve just been rejecting it for not permanent and distinct because I don’t know what to reject it for.
that will depend on the nomination, but that is what i usually use as well. i hope they will add back “doesn’t meet criteria” to the review flow, but am not holding my breath.
I’m still of the opinion that if we mark the socialise, exercise and explore categories all as thumbs down, this should trigger a prompt asking you if you want to reject the nomination for not meeting wayfarer criteria (and this should be better communicated instead of just “wayfarer criteria” as the rejection reason).
For a long time we’ve been told that the eligibility criteria requires a location to be a great place to socialise, a great place to exercise and/or a great place to explore. So it doesn’t really make sense that if we mark something as not being any of those, it isn’t automatically prompted to be a rejection for not meeting wayfarer criteria, as those are the literal eligibility criteria checks.
9 Likes
I love this! It would still require more thought, that I would guess is the reason that “Does not meet criteria” was removed, and would confirm that we are rejecting the nomination.
1 Like
Thats a great idea